An awful lot to digest and I'm not likely to even try, sorry. I need fewer factors with your best judgement to level the field. My days of instant understand of numbers expressed exponentially are behind me, alas. I remain stunned at the work but need it boiled down a bit. Perhaps the tables could form linked substack pages to tidy things a bit. There is just a lot there and I can't see the forest, forgive me professor.
I was thinking about how I might reply, and then I got this idea: I might craft a short piece--a piece absent any tables and nearly absent any graphs--that tells the story. And if the reader needs evidence ... I will refer them back to tables in the present post.
An awful lot to digest and I'm not likely to even try, sorry. I need fewer factors with your best judgement to level the field. My days of instant understand of numbers expressed exponentially are behind me, alas. I remain stunned at the work but need it boiled down a bit. Perhaps the tables could form linked substack pages to tidy things a bit. There is just a lot there and I can't see the forest, forgive me professor.
The essay does make for a demanding read.
I was thinking about how I might reply, and then I got this idea: I might craft a short piece--a piece absent any tables and nearly absent any graphs--that tells the story. And if the reader needs evidence ... I will refer them back to tables in the present post.
Would help me fully appreciate the work.